During the production for radio assignment we have produced multiple radio news broadcasts that would fit into everyday news broadcasts featured on various radio stations.In the process of creating our two radio segments we faced difficulties as my two connected stories did not have enough audio to form both types of treatments, this meant that I had to solve this problem to do one of the broadcasts had to be changed altogether. This changed the way that we tackled the two stories and meant that they loose their connection changing various features such as the target audiences.
The first we chose was based around a local event happening in Emsworth as it at the time was set to become the first ever Red Nose Day town. The event that happened over the weekend commencing on the Friday of Read Nose Day featured a series of individual events from a giant silent disco in the town square to stand up comedy in the local pub. The whole event raised money for comic relief and will go to help various children around the world. The event was organised by Wemsfest director Mark Ringwood. To start to create the script for the radio piece we had address who would listen to this particular story so we needed to identify the target audience. The audience for this particular story would be family orientated as they events being held are tailored to all ages and it takes just one of the family to hear it but it would be predominantly aimed at parents. As this is the target audience it is more then likely to be on an adult-contemporary station such as Heart FM.The next step to forming the script was deciding upon the treatment we wanted to use for this story we decided to use a voicer this meant that we had to arrange an interview with the leader of the event in this case Mark Ringwood. From here we formed a script using professional features such as introducing a reporters intro. Overall, to create this story once the audio had been recorded we needed to edit it into a short and snappy peice that was clear and concise whilst still retaining the information needed. All of the research done was through other news outlets and local webpages for the area.
The second story we choose to focus on was about the planned strikes by the National Rail. The strikes that were due to happen on Monday 16th would have lead to many train cancellations and delays so close to the then upcoming bank holiday weekend. The strike was due to cuts in wages given to the National Rail workers. The main target audience for this peice would most likely be commuters and holiday makers these would be between the ages of 18-50s and would be listeners to both contemporary and adult contemporary radio stations. The treatment we decided to use for this particular story was a vox-pop this was because we thought that the most effected party in this story was the general public so they should have their say. To record the vox-pops we asked a wide variety of age groups making sure that each answer was different depending on the travel of that person. To follow professional practice we made sure that enough people were asked the same question to get varied respoces and this could then forfill the minimum amount of 3 people on the peice. This was extended by the reporters script that featured all needed details provided through secondary research on various news outlets webpages.
Over the time of this assignment we as a team faced many problems that showed particular strengths and weaknesses. The main of these weaknesses was the time management as the project took longer then it should have to complete all tasks. We also had problems with the lack of audio that we produced due to not gaining enough whilst at the events, this could have been improved. Overall, We produced two stories that forfilled the given brief to the best of our ability.
Tuesday, 2 June 2015
Tuesday, 26 May 2015
Vox Pop
For our vox pop we had to change story due to the lack of interviews we had for our original Red Nose Day story so instead we chose to cover The planned strikes from the national rail causing for many South West Train services to be cancelled.
Check this out on Chirbit
Reporters Script
The National Rail service has planned to go on strike as a protest on higher wages, of the National Rail service go through with the strike. South West Trains have announced that their train services will be cancelled or revised from 5pm on Monday the 16th. The strike will cause major delays for all commuters and holiday makers as it is close to the Bank Holiday weekend. To see how this will affect people' travel we asked a few members of the public.
Vox pop Questions
Will the planned rail strikes affect your journeys ?
Do you heavily reply on the railway for your travel ?
Do you think that these strikes have taken it too far ?
Do you think that National Rail employees should receive higher wages ?
Final Audio
Check this out on Chirbit
Thursday, 21 May 2015
Final Voice Piece
Check this out on Chirbit
Voice piece for radio news - script intro
The UK's very first red nose day town is set to be happening in Emsworth, in aid of comic relief. Our reporter Emmanuella Ngimbi has more on this.
Cut: Ngimbi1
Dur: 22 seconds
Out: From Emsworth
Reporter's voice piece
Mark Ringwood the events organiser teamed up with Emsworth business association to create what has now become the Uk's very first red nose day town. The red nose day event will last all weekend and with include activities and competitions such as a silent disco, comedy night club and many more
This has been Emmanuella Ngimbi reporting live from Emsworth
Cut: Ngimbi1
Dur: 22 seconds
Out: From Emsworth
Reporter's voice piece
Mark Ringwood the events organiser teamed up with Emsworth business association to create what has now become the Uk's very first red nose day town. The red nose day event will last all weekend and with include activities and competitions such as a silent disco, comedy night club and many more
This has been Emmanuella Ngimbi reporting live from Emsworth
Thursday, 26 March 2015
Assignment Three- Practical Radio News
Write a peice of copy for this radio bulletin aimed at a teenage audience. Your copy should reflect the news values for that audience and be written in an appropriates style.
A Hampshire town has been declared the 1st ever 'Red Nose Town'.Emsworth has been selected to hold various comical events throughout the weekend including a silent disco in the town square, Stand up gigs in the Pub and even a coin chain down the Mill Pond wall.
We stopped by and asked a few locals about what they thought of the event taking over the town.
Thursday, 26 February 2015
Writting copy - script
Look at the following story from
Hampshire Police
· What are the 5 W’s ?
Who, why, when, what, where
· Is any part of this story opinion?
There is no distinct opinion although the quote may influence the story one as it is partial to the police, it has a balanced view.
· Write this story into a piece of copy
as close to 90 words long as possible, aiming to use the 3 C’s and 5 W’s
An investigation has started after a group of boys assulted a 25-year-old women with learning difficulties. The incident took place on christmas day when the young women with a rare genetic condition called Williams syndrome was walking along St Andrews Road.
Here the women and her following cat were verbally assulted and threated before being beaton.
A Hampshire costabulary spokeman has stated that the only reason for this attack was because of the womens appereace. They are currently appealing for any whitnesses to this assult to come forward. They are also hoping for any information about the identities of the youth suspects. To report any information the line is open on the normal 101 system.
A Hampshire costabulary spokeman has stated that the only reason for this attack was because of the womens appereace. They are currently appealing for any whitnesses to this assult to come forward. They are also hoping for any information about the identities of the youth suspects. To report any information the line is open on the normal 101 system.
The 25-year-old, who has a rare genetic condition called Williams syndrome, was walking along St. Andrews Road near Hudson Road at around 5.20pm on Sunday, December 25, 2011 when she was approached by a group of boys.
It’s alleged the boys verbally abused and threatened her before assaulting this woman and her pet cat, which was following her.
The woman received slight bruising to her face, and was left frightened and distressed by these events. She went back to her flat and locked herself in shortly after the assault, which was later reported to the police by her family.
The group of boys were described as being aged between 12 and 15. They were riding a number of micro-scooters and one bicycle. One of the boys was wearing blue jeans and a blue top with the hood up.
A Hampshire Constabulary spokesman said: "These were cruel and despicable actions towards a vulnerable woman who is usually trusting of people as she tries to lead an independent life.
"On Christmas Day evening, this woman wanted to prove her independence by walking from her flat to her mother’s address nearby for the first time in the dark. It’s believed that the group of boys targeted this woman because of her appearance and the way she walks, which is as a result of challenges with her co-ordination.
"We are appealing for witnesses to this assault in St. Andrews Road on Christmas Day or anyone with information about the identities of the youth suspects."
People with information are asked to contact Southsea police station by phoning 101. Mini-com users can phone 01962 875000. Information can be given anonymously by phoning the independent Crimestoppers charity on 0800 555 111.
Thursday, 12 February 2015
Media Law and the modern journalist
Introduction
In recent years the modern journalist has to tackle many complicated stories that may face problems due to law restrictions. These include defamation, contempt of court and reporting restrictions. They may harm a stories quality and quantity but must be abided. If these laws are to be broken the journalist could face anything from expensive court cases to up to 2 year in prison. In the modern age laws can be regularly broken without realization .As media platforms such as social media are rising in popularity so is the spread of news, highlighting any and all faults. In this report I will research how a journalist has to evolve to fit the modern world and the laws that comes with it.
Defamation
In the modern age there are many ways that we can harm a persons reputation without realizing it using such platforms as social media which allows a statement to be spread worldwide within a matter of minutes. This has lead to law being put place to stop this action known as defamation. The official definition of defamation is "The communication of a false statement that harms a reputation". Defamation can come in two forms eatheir from slander or libel. Slander is the use of spoken words or a shared message to create the damage for example gossip or the spread of harmful rumors. Libel is instead the use of the written word used most typically in print media such as Magazines and newspapers. This is often the most popular means of causing defamation as libel is easier to prove then slander where the evidence that can be shown in court if limited where as in a libel case there is solid evidence.
Journalists are not the only cause of defamation as the digital age has progressed it has brought active community with it allowing people to share a whole range of wider opinions that can break many of the laws previously connected mostly to journalists. This has lead to reoccurring cases involving statements said on social media sites such as Facebook and Twitter. These sites allow anyone and everyone to have an opinion that could be read by thousands. Leading to the public not only being easily targeted as victim of defamation but they could can also as easily be the cause of it. Once the act of defamation has been committed a court case is likely to ensue mostly just involving the larger case between businesses and media outlets. This happens mostly due to the cost of a defamation court case, this cost also means that many sort the issues on their own accord although cases so happen all the time but it does irradiate smaller cases that are sometimes only gossip and haven't had a large effect on either the victim . This has been criticized but has not been changed yet.
Once a court case has started there are many defenses that may be used. One defense is the use of privilege this is when a journalist can claim innocence as the information stated was from an absolute or qualified source. If the information was absolute it would have been taken from a case covered in court or the house of parliament. The journalist may say that their statement was qualified this means that the information was provided from an official police statement. This only works if it was printed without malice or its just being interesting to the public. Overall, privilege is a defense that easily allows a journalist the right to publish correct information. An another common law defense is the use of fair comment this specifically allows journalists to express a statement that may be true because of public interest. This can be done as long as the statements made do not happen without intention to harm the reported a person.
Public interest is a common statement when speaking about journalism as it is often used as a loophole within defamation cases as the defense itself allows a journalist to publish or state information on the ground that the public has to know. This is specifically the reason journalists are used within communities as one of their main purposes is to unveil any issues that may effect the public life's for example injustices with the law or scams within the government. This information needs to be published but sometimes journalists may cross the line and publish information that is just interesting to the public for example celebrity gossip. Interesting to the public stories may delve deep and can harm people reputations just because its interesting, this can see mostly through the example of The Leveson inquiry where many journalists publishes information that they stated was public interest allowing them to justify hacking phones and publishing false information. The line between the defense public interest and an interesting to the public are often blurred, causing strong injustices within the system that are yet to be fixed.
In 2013 The Defemation Act of 1996 was replaced due to its lack of protection covering the new cases caused by new media such as social networks.The recent Act changes that were made include changing the court proceedings as now the victim has to show series harm or damages this maybe in the form of losing money from there organisation or having a large impact on their everyday lives. They have also altered it to suit the need to include modern technology as word can be spread faster then before, to fix this they have introduced a defense for people using social media sites. This means people creating content that harms people through Facebook or Twitter can now be accused of Defamation. The main problem they have tried to stop is the use of fair- comment , public image or honest opinion within the court situations as this has been use for many years to defend statements within the media. This arises the problem between what is public interest and what is interesting to the public as one can help a journalist with their piece and the other can place them within Defemation.
To delve deeper into the Defemation Act I have found an example of a libel case. The recent libel case that sees a professional typist take to Twitter after not being payed for work she completed for Resolution production . She is know facing libel court costs as she tweeted straight to Important people in the industry such as Sir Alan Sugar and the owner of the company itself.The two parties involved include the 55 year old typist Lesley Kemp and a the production company Resolution production. The case started after Kemp completed some transcription work for the company on a freelance basis. The production company then failed to pay her the £150 she was owed and when she did receive money two months after the work was completed they docked her £25 for ' bank charges'. After this the typist took to twitter and tweeted pleas to the business owner Kirby Keans and other business Vips including Alan Sugar, Theo Pathitas and Duncan Bannatyne. In this pleas she tried to name and shame the company for their lack of professionalism. This was when the company hit back with the libel court case. There was no direct statement published from the company in question . Instead Resolution production has claimed that they want to the damages to be paid for an up to value of £50,000. After this the typist took legal advice to find that if she lost the case she could be paying the court cost and fines at a minimum of £100,000.The case is still yet to go to court although it has been stated that it might not. Although people have come together to help Kemp by raising £2000 for initial court costs. I think that this story was mainly published due to the connections it holds to celebrities as they were witnesses to the case , there is also an community effect that is created by the people trying to help Kemp raise the funds to proceed to stop her bad treatment. This community spirit allows you to empathize with the story although it may not involve a company or journalist. It does show that anyone is at risk or could claim Defemation. This just goes to prove that all people especially journalists need to be trained and aware of the problems that they could incur due to being unaware of the law.(1)
Contempt of court
Contempt of court is the control of court proceeding by restricting the influence of information that is published during 'active proceedings' that may sway the judges or jury's overall decision. It mainly exists to protect court and the justice that it can provide as the accused are Innocent till proven guilty. This is covered by the Contempt of Court Act (CCA) 1981 which includes a 'strict liability rule' that prevents any publication or broadcast from affecting the decisions of the court. If this is broken the maximum prison sentence that can be given is 2 years. This highlights that all journalist must be informed of these laws as it is easily broken with the littlest information. In the modern age this law is becoming more difficult to regulate as news stories now can be spread worldwide within seconds and can come from a multitude of sources some even anonymously, this currently is not accounted for within the current Act which is increasingly becoming outdated.
In the UK there are two types of law; common law and statue law. Common law is law set by precedent this means that decisions made will be referenced from past court proceedings. This will also take into an account the punishment that the accused received. Statute law instead is the written law, this is entirely dependent on the legislation decided by laws that have been laid out by the government. These two types of law can change the way in which a court proceeds as cases dependent on legislation are often quicker and a sentence will be reached faster this aids a journalist who will receive clearer information that can be published faster. Instead common law in longer as a decision has to be made accurately a journalist may use to their advantage as when reporting they can refer to past court cases this puts them at less risk of breaking contempt of court.
A journalist can be limited by the term 'active proceedings' as within this time in court information can not be published as it may affect the justice given within court. When a court case is in active proceedings is hard to determine as it covers the majority of court proceedings from when the crime is committed till when a sentence or acquittal has been made. To understand this you have to know that a case starts as soon a crime has been committed, Soon after this an arrest or warrant for arrest will be put into place until a charge is made before going to trial which will start at magistrates and possibly proceed to crown court. This will result in jury deliberations that will count towards the ending in a final sentence or acquittal. If a journalist is to publish any information in detail once the crime has been committed they will be at risk of breaking contempt under common law where as if information is published or broadcast from the starts of court proceedings the law will be broken under statute law. In an ideal world any information should be published till the court proceedings have ended.
Contempt of court can be hard to determine as it is dependent on the situation. So they mainly determine a case firstly by its severity which can be dependent on a few other features including :
- Time : The time in between the story being printed or broadcast and the jury retiring to reach a verdict can change the story being within contempt. As the judgement may not be affected by the story if a verdict has already been decided. This is becoming harder and harder with modern technology as a story can be spread within minutes across the globe on multiple platforms.Even if the judgement has already been made there is still a case for contempt.
- Proximity : If the story is published in a different county or country the story may have not reached the trial yet leading to less risk of it affecting the case. To decide if this is a consideration the judge will have to weigh up the possibility and distance that story would have had to travel. This again like time has become more complex in the modern era as the story is likely to be published online which can be accessed easily and may reach the court within minutes.
- Initial impact; This decides how many people would have seen the story and whether the importance of the information was extenuated by the exposure of the story.
- Residual impact: This is whether the story has lasting memory as it may effect its victim in the long term damaging their reputation possibly causing a case of defamation.
Once all these factors have been taken in to consideration the punishment will be decided and the next steps may be taken. This may include the court proceedings being restarted as an effect from the story. Overall, breaking contempt of court may effect not only the journalist but the connected media outlet leading to large costs and effects in their reputation. This can be stopped and is stopped by law training for all active journalists.
As example of contempt of court is seen obviously through examples such as the Christopher Jefferies case. The case started with the murder of Jo Yates shortly the next door neighbor and landlord Christopher Jefferies was taken in for questioning as this happened information was published through the press about his 'unusual' past and some of his personality traits that could make him the kind of person to kill. This was all published while the proceeding where active from big tabloids such as The daily Mirror and The Sun. The publications put doubts within the minds or jurors leading the hounding of Jefferies by the media but also false judgement within the case itself. This false judgement was then discovered and Mr Jefferies was released. The press didn't stop publishing information about the case while it was active leading to a case of gross misconduct by breaking the contempt of court law. The newspapers where then forced to apologize. (2)
As example of contempt of court is seen obviously through examples such as the Christopher Jefferies case. The case started with the murder of Jo Yates shortly the next door neighbor and landlord Christopher Jefferies was taken in for questioning as this happened information was published through the press about his 'unusual' past and some of his personality traits that could make him the kind of person to kill. This was all published while the proceeding where active from big tabloids such as The daily Mirror and The Sun. The publications put doubts within the minds or jurors leading the hounding of Jefferies by the media but also false judgement within the case itself. This false judgement was then discovered and Mr Jefferies was released. The press didn't stop publishing information about the case while it was active leading to a case of gross misconduct by breaking the contempt of court law. The newspapers where then forced to apologize. (2)
Reporting Restrictions
Reporting restrictions are the laws that are in place to protect the proceeding of court and the people that are within them. A journalist will face many of these restrictions within their career, it is down to them and the media outlet to keep up to date with the laws, as they have to be aware of the laws that they could possible break. The most common case a journalist will face is restriction against publishing a persons identity whether this be because of their age or due to the nature of the case. This also restricts publishing any information that could lead to the discovery of their identity as this will limit the information that can be published.
Different cases maybe under different levels of protection and different reasons. Some maybe under automatic protection this also can be dependent on the case itself. If a journalist does not know the level of protection that is placed on a particular case they need to check with the authorities. Cases that maybe under protection include proceedings under the children s act, victims of sexual offences and
prelim hearings in magistrates court.A case that is dealing with victims of sexual offences will automatically place it's victims under reporting restrictions to protect their identities. This will help the victim not only to recover but will also protect them from any connected harassers and they do not face any harm due to the nature of the case.If any journalist does reveal a victims identity they will also be at risk of breaking contempt of court and reporting restrictions. This is punishable by upto 2 years in jail. If the victim is found to have placed malicious claim they will still be under protection until the court reaches a verdict.
There are many restrictions facing children within court as their identities are to be kept secret. This may only change if were trialed within an adult court. This is rare as most cases are covered through youth court but if there are extreme cases such as manslaughter or murder the circumstances change. If the case is moved to an adult court a judge can place a section 39 order on the child. This is put in place just like the reporting restrictions to hide the identity of the child. This is done to protect the childs future as under a restricted age a child is not really responsible for its actions. The section 39 may be removed at the end of a case although this is rarely done. This maybe due to public interest but this is entirely down to the judges decision.
A popular example of the impact of reporting restrictions can be seen through the case of James Bulger's murder. In this case a 2 year old was abducted and murdered by two young boys who throughout the case were referred to as 'boy A and boy B', due to the reporting restrictions placed on the case. This case became a centre point for public media attention due to the shock. This lead to them being found guilty by the judge Mr justice Morland who later lifted all reporting restrictions placed onto the case, allowing the media to reveal their identities.This lead to the boys in the future receiving new identities after being released.(3)
There are many restrictions facing children within court as their identities are to be kept secret. This may only change if were trialed within an adult court. This is rare as most cases are covered through youth court but if there are extreme cases such as manslaughter or murder the circumstances change. If the case is moved to an adult court a judge can place a section 39 order on the child. This is put in place just like the reporting restrictions to hide the identity of the child. This is done to protect the childs future as under a restricted age a child is not really responsible for its actions. The section 39 may be removed at the end of a case although this is rarely done. This maybe due to public interest but this is entirely down to the judges decision.
A popular example of the impact of reporting restrictions can be seen through the case of James Bulger's murder. In this case a 2 year old was abducted and murdered by two young boys who throughout the case were referred to as 'boy A and boy B', due to the reporting restrictions placed on the case. This case became a centre point for public media attention due to the shock. This lead to them being found guilty by the judge Mr justice Morland who later lifted all reporting restrictions placed onto the case, allowing the media to reveal their identities.This lead to the boys in the future receiving new identities after being released.(3)
conclusion
Defemation, contempt of court and reporting are all put in place to protect the proceeding of court and the people within it. It allows journalists to identify the information which they are allowed to publish due to the interest of the general public. This is why the journalist in our modern age should be fully trained in journalism laws.This will not only protect their careers but also the courts.A modern journalist needs to be able to create a story that follows all laws but to a quality that is still news-worthy.
Bibliography
2. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-25625572, BBC News, 10th January 2014.
Thursday, 5 February 2015
Law - Contempt of court
What is Contempt of Court ?
Contempt of court is a law that protects the running of court proceedings. This law has a 'strict liablity laws' this means that it is strictly banned to publish any information that may impact the desdions made in court. This can lead to the maximum of 2 years in prison but this is difficult to strcitly rule as the world has become smaller due to technology meaning that the word can be spread easier making it easier to publish anything that may be part of contempt of court.
Construct your own timeline to demenstrate the term 'active proceeding'
Contempt of court is in place when the active proceeding are happening this is the stage when the crime has hapened up to when the judgement has been made this will happen in the following timeline.
CRIME - The crime has been commited and needs to be followed to court.
ARREST OR WARRENT FOR ARREST- people have been found linking to the case and suspects are taken in for questioning.
CHARGE- They have found the criminal and are ready to take them to court.
TRIAL- This will be in the process of magistrates to crown court
JURY DELIBERATIONS - The jury discusses and confirms
VIRDICT- They decide whether the accused is Guilty and non guilty
SENTENCE OR AQUITTAL- It is decided whether they will serve time or another agreement will do.
To be under cotempt of court you cant report anything from the start of proceedings till a virdict or sentence has been decided this also has to take into consideration what reporting restrictions their maybe around the case. If any information is leaked the court proceedings can be at risk as the information may sway the juries judgement.
JURY DELIBERATIONS - The jury discusses and confirms
VIRDICT- They decide whether the accused is Guilty and non guilty
SENTENCE OR AQUITTAL- It is decided whether they will serve time or another agreement will do.
To be under cotempt of court you cant report anything from the start of proceedings till a virdict or sentence has been decided this also has to take into consideration what reporting restrictions their maybe around the case. If any information is leaked the court proceedings can be at risk as the information may sway the juries judgement.
Describe the strict liability rule ?
It is law in which a journalist is stopped from publishing any information in which a sentance could be change for example a juror must not be able to see an article that will sway their choice. This would possibly stop and restart the court proceedings as the article has done severe damage.
Research a contempt of court case or what was the outcome or do you think the outcome was right ?
A very popluar case was in the investigation into the muder of Joanna Yates in which a supect was the landlord who lived in a flat above hers. The landlord was arrested as suspect and was placed into investigation. Once this had happened newspaper started realeasing information on the man Chris Jefferies and soon published information that could of swayed the courts judgement but also cusing a case of defemation once his name had been dragged through the dirt. He took the papers to court and recieved jusgment that the newspaper were wrong I think this was the correct judgement.
Thursday, 22 January 2015
Goldilocks and the legal minefield
We have looked at the major areas of
law; now see if you can spot
them in this well-known story.
law; now see if you can spot
them in this well-known story.
You are a journalist working for Forest News; this
exclusive story comes to you from an unknown source claiming to be an eyewitness.
Dear News Editor,
I am the local Neighborhood watch representative
for the Dark Woods and last night there was a terrible commotion going on at
the Three Bears Cottage, I had to call the police who turned up and, in the
end, arrested someone.
Anyway, I was talking to Daddy Bear today and he
reliably told me what happened. I’ve
known Daddy Bear 30 years; he’s not one to lie! He
said that his wife had cooked some porridge for their tea last night, he’d just got home from work and because it was way too hot to eat,
they thought they’d go out for a walk
with their son Baby Bear.
They came home sometime later to find their
house had been broken into, not only that furniture had been smashed and Baby
Bear’s porridge had been stolen. Even more
worrying, they eventually found the intruder, the blonde lass that I saw being
arrested, asleep in his son’s bed! Some people
have no shame!
Well I reckon it’s that Goldilocks lass from the other side of the woods, not only
has she been missing for a couple of days but she’s got previous too – apparently she
helped the Big Bad Wolf break into Old Grandmother Riding Hood’s cottage last year, nothing got done about that and I suspect this
will be the same so I thought I would write to you, incase you wanted to send a
reporter over? I’d be happy to talk to
you; I’m fed up with the juvenile crime rate in
this area! Bloody kids with nothing better to do!
Anyway, I have started looking into this to save
you some time and I spoke to my friend at Forest Crown Court to see if he’d heard anything. He told me, off the record, that it is that
Goldilocks girl and the police have charged her too – apparently she’s in court tomorrow,
so you best be quick if you want a bit of an exclusive on this.
Yours sincerely
Mr Woodcutter
Dark Woods Neighborhood Watch
Task:
· Identify the areas of the law that you are
at risk of breaking if you publish this story
· Decide on the best course of action for
trying to overcome these areas
· What would you need to do before you could
start writing this?
· Try and write a piece of legally safe copy
stating the facts – this is a fictional scenario but a real challenge
that journalists face!
· Put all your work on your Radio News Blog
First course of action would be?
|
Area of law at risk of breaking and why
|
Is it possible to overcome this and how?
|
|
Slander
The opinion is heavily involved and can influence the writer when
punlishing the strory. This could ruin the public opinion of goldilocks
before it has gone to court.
Previous convictions should not be mentioned after contempt of
court.
|
It is by not adding this influenced opinion into the piece and
taking only the factual evidence that is provided you could write the article
on this basis.
|
|
Animinty – court restrictions
The baby and possibly goldilocks will be too young to mention
within a publishment due to court restrictions. This means that their
identity will be protected.
|
This could be overcome by not mentioning anything that could be
connected to the younger people. This may be stating just ‘girl’ instead of her
full name.
|
|
d
Contempt of court.
The word from the court room that are off the record are contempt
of court. As the case must not be shared around before the judgement has been
decided.
|
This could be overcome by not writing it into the report or
letting it influence the piece in any way.
|
|
Baby bear is a victim of crime as he is the victom or the parents
as they may locate or influence the crime.
|
This can be overdone but must have no clues on to the
identification on the family.
|
Defamation
They can
not put that she committed criminal offences- unless this is confimed by the
Police and needs justification. You could not argue ‘privalage’ as its from a
private source and don’t yet know if its
true.
She or anyone else called Golilocks can sue you
for liable if its not confimed and identified properly.
Contempt of court
Goldilocks appears to have convictions- thismust
be confimed and justified
The proceeding are active so impotant
information must not be published although
they could publish a police appeal.
Goldilock is under 10 so she is in youth court
and cannot be published. She cannot be charged with a criminal offence. If in
crown court their needs a section 39 placed upon it.
The punishment is a prison sentence of upto 2
years.
Child Annonymity
Baby bear should not be mentioned as he is under
16 and under the PCC code he is a victim of crime.
Sexual offences
Goldilock in the bed means that she might be
under the SOA act.
Baby bear might get life long protection along
with his parents.
Child protection
Goldilocks may be a vonrable child and are
subject to a care order or be a ward of court so they can not be named
publically without the courts
Thursday, 8 January 2015
Law- Reporting restrictions
There are many restrictions that hinder a journalists story when reporting on court news. These laws stop the journalist broadcasting whatever they please regarding cases that are effecting peoples lives by keeping to the laws set out they are protected by the goverment.
Why do Reporting restrictions exist and what do they cover?
Reporting restriction are put in place to protect victims and some criminals in court to stop future injustice for example the hunt for a past victim when out of jail. It can protect many features although it is also dependant on the court case and whether their is the right to know certain information. Some of the cases that may be protected include :
Broadcaster must offer the opportunity to take part in constituency or electoral area reports or discussions, to all candidates within the constituency or electoral area representing parties with previous significant electoral support or where there is evidence of significant current support, including any such independent candidate (rule 6.10)
- Victims of sexual offences. This is covered by the sexual offences ( amendement) Act 1992
- Youth court proceedings are covered fully by the Children and young persons Act 1933 but this may be changed in the use of a section 39 when an adult appears in an adult court.
- Alleged offences by teachers against pupils is covered by the 141F of the edjucation act 2002.
These restriction are put in place for the protection of these pupils rights and to stop any future danger.
What is a section 39 order?
In any circumstances that involves child under the age of 18 to be within court will be automatically protected by reporting restrictions to help them in the future. This is typical of child court but when a case is severe often like murder or manslaughter it may be carried out in adult court in this case a section 39 will have placed upon the childrens identities to keep them protected. This means that they can not be identifies in the press anyway whether this be by puzzle identifcation or anything else.
What restrictions cover elections - when does the election period start ahead of this years General elections ?
The press is a large part of the election as it plays a main role on what partys get attraction and in trun more followers so their is a large need to regulate this. This is done through the use of restrictions although they cant go to far as it is known that new papers and outlets have their own political preferences such as The Sun is known to be a huge supporter of the conservatives. To spread an even coverage of parties their are certain rules that must be obliged by for example :
- Their must be an even coverage of all parties upto the election period.
- If a candiatate is offered the opputunity of exposure by broadcaster each party has to recieve the same offer.
- Any constituency or electoral area report or discussion after the close of nominations must include a list of all candidates standing
These restrictions are all in place during the election period this is a 3 months before the general election is to take place.
Why did the judge lift the reporting restrictions in the case of the Bulger killers? Was this the right thing to do?
The reporting restrictions where lifted upon the Bulger Killers who were two underage murderers due to a brutal attack upon a younger chid at a mall should have been put in place to protect their indetities automatically. This stopped when the case had to be resolved in adult court meanig that section 39 would have to put in place normally but due to public intrest created mainly by the media exposure of the story the restrictions were lifted by the judge allowing the press to publish all information in the two children and even allowed them the access to photos and their families.
This was a controversial descion as the children were now exposed and placed at risk of their own futures thid meant on the time of their release a fake identity was to be given to the two boys. I personally do not think that this was the right action due to the nature of the press the victims family now could be intruded at a time of hardship and grief leading to mixed emotions. It also could of created a contempt of court normally but would not in this case so the wide spread knowledge could have swayed many of the descions made in the court room.
What is operation Yewtree ? Who has their identity protected in this investigation and why ?
Operation Yewtree is investigation into the abuse of young children by public figures. After the reveal of Jimmy Savile as a pedofile after having access to young children that have now come forward as adults shortly after his death to expose the truth. This lead to further allogations of other celebrities at the time of the offences to be taken into consideration and to lead any further victims of Savile to come forward. The operation has made a few accusations and has exposed more of the victims that now have the right to have their idenitiy protected not only due to the nature of the incidents under the sexual offences act 1992 but also because at the time of the offence thay would have been under 18 so they would have been protected. This leaves them with the desicion on whether they want to reveal their indentity.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)